"Mangkang Menua,Mangkang Dunya,Ngetan Ke Bansa!!"

January 2, 2010

What’s in a Name?

Original posting at http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/august/14.15.html?start=1
Christians in Southeast Asia debate their right to refer to God as Allah.
Susan Wunderink

Agnes Monica is the Miley Cyrus of Southeast Asia. The Indonesian teen singer’s face is ubiquitous. Her performances are packed out. But in Selangor, Malaysia, no one is allowed to play her song “Allah Peduli” (“God Cares”). Monica is a Christian, and Malaysian law bans non-Muslims from referring to God as Allah.

The ban on “God Cares” is one application of state laws widely opposed by the island nation’s Christians and other non-Muslims. Few question whether Allah is the God of the Bible—to Malaysian Christians, Allah is simply the word for God.

The decades-old state laws have gained recent prominence through The Herald, the national Catholic newspaper. Beginning in 1998, Malaysia’s Ministry of Home Affairs has sent letters to editor and priest Lawrence Andrew asking him to cease using Allah in the paper’s Malay edition. In 2007, the government threatened to ban the newspaper. Thus began a long legal battle, with government representatives issuing conflicting orders and the paper suing to both publish in Malay and continue its use of the theonym.

The newspaper acquired a printing permit for 2009. But on May 28, the church lost its suit to legally use Allah. A high court hearing that began July 7 should resolve the newspaper’s legal status.

Perhaps in anticipation of another unfavorable ruling, the Indonesian organization Yayasan Lentera Bangsa has published a new translation of the Bible in Indonesian. Allah does not appear in the Kitab Suci Indonesian Literal Translation (KS-ILT). Instead, the publishers transliterated Hebrew terms (such as Elohim) and substituted some less-common Indonesian names for God.

“Coincident with the forbidding of the use of Allah by non-Muslims in Malaysia, we think it is the time for us to release ourselves from the dilemma,” said editor Jahja Iskandar.

Mainstream churches, however, have been hostile to the KS-ILT. Neither the Bible Society of Indonesia nor that of Malaysia has approved the translation. The National Evangelical Christian Fellowship (NECF) of Malaysia issued a statement “strongly opposing” the translation. “We continue to maintain the right to use Allah as it has been so used for over 300 years in Malaysia,” the group said.

Evangelical observers support NECF’s move. “Theologically and missiologically, Allah is a very appropriate way [for Southeast Asian Christians] to refer to God,” said Ajith Fernando, national director of Youth for Christ in Sri Lanka.

Christians and Muslims sometimes misunderstand Allah to be purely Islamic. Instead, it is the Arabic word for God and a close semantic relative of the Hebrew El. In many Central Asian countries, Muslims use Khuda, the Persian word for God, rather than Allah. Christians in Palestine and other Arabic-speaking communities also refer to God as Allah.

The term spread to Southeast Asia in the 1100s as Muslim sultanates were established. It then became incorporated into the Malay language family, which includes Malaysian and Indonesian.

The Herald’s Andrew says outlawing its use by non-Muslims is as silly as arguing that breakfast cannot be used by people who mean anything other than cereal with milk. “The word God has no content other than what one’s belief posits,” he said.

The Malaysian government says the ban protects Muslims. Its letters telling the Herald to cease and desist “often concluded with their official sentiment that our use of the word Allah will cause confusion among the believers and threaten security of the nation,” said Andrew.

Christians have used the word for centuries, and the conflict is not new. A Wycliffe translator who has been in the region for several years said this debate began when the first Bible was published in Malay, using Allah, in 1985.

Andrew said, “It has always been difficult to import the Indonesian Bible, which contains the word Allah. Books and other devotionals items have also been impounded.”

“If local Christians understand Allah to mean the God of history, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit, then [the usage ban is] a religious freedom issue,” said Chris Seiple, president of the Institute for Global Engagement. “Politically it would certainly serve the interest of the government to say, ‘There’s only one God and his name is Allah and his prophet is Muhammad—and they belong to us.’ ”

The Herald‘s leadership and the NECF see the debate as a matter of freedom rather than linguistics. They are concerned that the law marginalizes non-Muslims, who make up almost half of Malaysia’s population.

Andrew says the crackdown on his newspaper indicates “the country is moving away from the multireligious and multiethnic composition that negotiated independence from the British to a domination of one race over all.”

In addition to the linguistic and human rights aspects of the debate, Malaysian Christians must also keep missiology in mind.

An Allah-free translation into a Malay language can be done correctly, but it would be confusing, said the Wycliffe translator. Importing a word for God instead of using the most accessible local term often causes people to think of God himself as a foreign import.

“My opinion is that using Allah in Indonesia is strategic, if the point is to have people understand who Christ is,” said the translator, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “The negative impact of not using it is that it would make it harder for a Muslim to pick up a Bible.”

On the other hand, the controversy itself may make Allah a less appropriate term, said Fernando. “We want to make the Muslims our friends. We are not there to defeat them in a battle or an argument. We want them to come to Christ,” he said. “This is the practical reality we have to bow down to, although theologically it may be unnecessary.”

Should Christians in Malaysia stop calling God Allah? If so, Fernando said, it would be for reasons other than accurate translation. “The only advantage is to avoid outrage,” he said. “I can’t see any other advantage.”


It has been very well expressed opinion with FACT and FIGURE  here to further strenghten the BASIS of ARGUEMENT..I strongly agree with this article.But i felt so SAD,FRUSTRATED and PISS OFF when i saw TV3 News this evening.

1.How come they are allowed to give such statement?

2.Yes,they mah have a right for their own views or perspective but they have GONE TOO FAR by CONDEMN CHRISTIANITY and to an extent that they are DARE ENOUGH to question the HOLY TRINITY?

3.They are saying that MUSLIMS as the MAJORITY in Malaysia and their RIGHT should be protected?There is non issue at all about their right of so called Ketuanan Melayu,Ketuanan Islam or whatever it is but the MAIN ISSUE here is the word ALLAH!!!

4.Why we cant see any representative from the Catholic Church being interviewed?

5.TV3 as a MEDIA should be fair and doesnt being a biased when reporting.Exchange of views should be GOOD but not to an extent that CONDEMN each other!!!

6.Allah word being used even by Priest in Arabs countries.So whats wrong with it here in Malaysia?

7.After all,we are all CONVERTS either ISLAM of CHRISTIAN!!

I have wrote about this before and im glad that the Court Ruling favour my opinion

https://pengayau.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/allah-any-copyright-control-for-this-word/

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: